feat(db): stock CHECK constraints + audit_logs DATETIME (2038 fix)

Migration 20260612234500: CHECK (quantity >= 0) on sklad_batches and
sklad_item_locations — the DB itself now rejects negative stock, so a
future C2-class bug (cumulative decrements driving a batch negative and
silently vanishing from totals) becomes a loud error instead of hidden
corruption. All three databases verified clean of negative rows before
the migration.

audit_logs.created_at TIMESTAMP(0) -> DATETIME(0): TIMESTAMP dies in 2038
and converts through the session timezone; existing wall times preserved
by the MODIFY.

Pinned by db-constraints.test.ts (4 tests, each watched fail pre-migration:
negative insert/update/location all succeeded before, 2098 audit timestamp
was rejected before).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
BOHA
2026-06-12 23:56:56 +02:00
parent fd2e613aa5
commit de6e9ac29f
5 changed files with 156 additions and 4 deletions

4
package-lock.json generated
View File

@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
{ {
"name": "app-ts", "name": "app-ts",
"version": "2.4.32", "version": "2.4.33",
"lockfileVersion": 3, "lockfileVersion": 3,
"requires": true, "requires": true,
"packages": { "packages": {
"": { "": {
"name": "app-ts", "name": "app-ts",
"version": "2.4.32", "version": "2.4.33",
"license": "ISC", "license": "ISC",
"dependencies": { "dependencies": {
"@anthropic-ai/sdk": "^0.102.0", "@anthropic-ai/sdk": "^0.102.0",

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
{ {
"name": "app-ts", "name": "app-ts",
"version": "2.4.32", "version": "2.4.33",
"description": "", "description": "",
"main": "dist/server.js", "main": "dist/server.js",
"scripts": { "scripts": {

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
-- AlterTable
ALTER TABLE `audit_logs` MODIFY `created_at` DATETIME(0) NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP(0);
-- Stock invariants enforced by the database itself: a future cumulative-
-- decrement bug (the C2 class — duplicate issue lines driving a batch
-- negative and silently vanishing from stock totals) becomes a loud error
-- instead of hidden corruption. All databases verified clean of negative
-- rows before this migration (2026-06-12).
ALTER TABLE `sklad_batches`
ADD CONSTRAINT `chk_sklad_batches_quantity_nonneg` CHECK (`quantity` >= 0);
ALTER TABLE `sklad_item_locations`
ADD CONSTRAINT `chk_sklad_item_locations_quantity_nonneg` CHECK (`quantity` >= 0);

View File

@@ -65,7 +65,9 @@ model audit_logs {
new_values String? @db.LongText new_values String? @db.LongText
user_agent String? @db.Text user_agent String? @db.Text
session_id String? @db.VarChar(128) session_id String? @db.VarChar(128)
created_at DateTime? @default(now()) @db.Timestamp(0) // DATETIME, not TIMESTAMP — TIMESTAMP dies in 2038 and converts through
// the session timezone (2026-06-12 hardening migration).
created_at DateTime? @default(now()) @db.DateTime(0)
@@index([action], map: "idx_audit_logs_action") @@index([action], map: "idx_audit_logs_action")
@@index([created_at], map: "idx_audit_logs_created") @@index([created_at], map: "idx_audit_logs_created")

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
import { describe, it, expect, beforeAll, afterAll } from "vitest";
import prisma from "../config/database";
/**
* Pins the 2026-06-12 DB hardening migration:
* 1. CHECK (quantity >= 0) on sklad_batches + sklad_item_locations — the DB
* itself rejects negative stock, so a future C2-class bug (cumulative
* decrements driving a batch negative) becomes a loud error instead of
* silently hidden corruption.
* 2. audit_logs.created_at is DATETIME, not TIMESTAMP — no 2038 cap.
*/
const N = "db_constraints_";
let itemId: number;
let locationId: number;
let receiptId: number;
let lineAId: number;
let lineBId: number;
async function cleanup() {
await prisma.sklad_batches.deleteMany({
where: { item: { name: { contains: N } } },
});
await prisma.sklad_item_locations.deleteMany({
where: { item: { name: { contains: N } } },
});
await prisma.sklad_receipt_lines.deleteMany({
where: { item: { name: { contains: N } } },
});
await prisma.sklad_receipts.deleteMany({ where: { notes: { contains: N } } });
await prisma.sklad_items.deleteMany({ where: { name: { contains: N } } });
await prisma.sklad_locations.deleteMany({
where: { name: { contains: N } },
});
await prisma.audit_logs.deleteMany({
where: { description: { contains: N } },
});
}
beforeAll(async () => {
await cleanup();
const item = await prisma.sklad_items.create({
data: { name: `${N}item`, unit: "ks" },
});
itemId = item.id;
const location = await prisma.sklad_locations.create({
data: { code: `DBC${Date.now() % 100000}`, name: `${N}loc` },
});
locationId = location.id;
const receipt = await prisma.sklad_receipts.create({
data: { notes: `${N}receipt`, status: "CONFIRMED" },
});
receiptId = receipt.id;
const lineA = await prisma.sklad_receipt_lines.create({
data: {
receipt_id: receiptId,
item_id: itemId,
quantity: 5,
unit_price: 1,
},
});
lineAId = lineA.id;
const lineB = await prisma.sklad_receipt_lines.create({
data: {
receipt_id: receiptId,
item_id: itemId,
quantity: 5,
unit_price: 1,
},
});
lineBId = lineB.id;
});
afterAll(async () => {
await cleanup();
await prisma.$disconnect();
});
describe("stock CHECK constraints", () => {
it("rejects inserting a negative batch quantity", async () => {
await expect(
prisma.sklad_batches.create({
data: {
item_id: itemId,
receipt_line_id: lineAId,
quantity: -1,
original_qty: 5,
unit_price: 1,
is_consumed: false,
},
}),
).rejects.toThrow();
});
it("rejects updating a batch quantity below zero", async () => {
const batch = await prisma.sklad_batches.create({
data: {
item_id: itemId,
receipt_line_id: lineBId,
quantity: 5,
original_qty: 5,
unit_price: 1,
is_consumed: false,
},
});
await expect(
prisma.$executeRaw`UPDATE sklad_batches SET quantity = -2 WHERE id = ${batch.id}`,
).rejects.toThrow();
const fresh = await prisma.sklad_batches.findUnique({
where: { id: batch.id },
});
expect(Number(fresh?.quantity)).toBe(5);
});
it("rejects a negative item_location quantity", async () => {
await expect(
prisma.sklad_item_locations.create({
data: { item_id: itemId, location_id: locationId, quantity: -1 },
}),
).rejects.toThrow();
});
});
describe("audit_logs.created_at has no 2038 cap", () => {
it("accepts a far-future timestamp (DATETIME, not TIMESTAMP)", async () => {
const row = await prisma.audit_logs.create({
data: {
action: "test",
description: `${N}future`,
created_at: new Date(Date.UTC(2098, 0, 15, 12, 0, 0)),
},
});
expect(row.created_at?.getUTCFullYear()).toBe(2098);
});
});